In The News

Advocacy helps limit Medicaid cuts and shape key health care legislation

Colorado's 2026 legislative session was defined by one issue: a state budget shortfall approaching $1.5 billion.

As lawmakers searched for savings, Medicaid became a primary target. Early discussions included Medicaid provider rate reductions of up to 4 percent, along with additional cost-cutting measures that would have significantly impacted providers and the patients they serve.

Throughout the session, the Home Care and Hospice Association of Colorado (HHAC) worked closely with legislators, state agencies and stakeholders to ensure policymakers understood the real-world impact of these proposals on providers, caregivers and the Coloradans who depend on care at home.

While difficult decisions were ultimately made, HHAC's advocacy helped prevent even deeper cuts and ensured providers had a seat at the table as policymakers weighed options.

HHAC fights to reduce the impact of Medicaid cuts

The final state budget included a 2% across-the-board Medicaid provider rate reduction. While any cut is concerning, it represents a significant improvement from earlier proposals that contemplated reductions as high as 4%.

HHAC worked extensively with lawmakers and the Department of Health Care Policy and Financing (HCPF) to highlight how additional cuts would threaten access to care, particularly at a time when providers are already struggling with workforce shortages, rising labor costs and increasing regulatory requirements.

The budget debate also included a series of long-term support services (LTSS) sustainability measures designed to slow Medicaid spending growth. HHAC actively engaged with policymakers throughout these discussions, advocating for flexibility and protecting access to services whenever possible.

Keeping providers at the table on major Medicaid changes

Several Medicaid cost-containment measures approved this year will affect providers and consumers over the coming months and years.

These include:

  • New service limits, or "soft caps," for certain home- and community-based services.

  • A phased implementation of caregiver-hour limits, eventually capping most caregivers at 56 hours per week.

  • Changes to developmental disability waiver enrollment and transitions.

  • Additional efforts by the state to control Medicaid spending growth.

HHAC worked to ensure policymakers understood the potential impact of these changes and will continue advocating for practical implementation that protects access to care.

Reshaping reporting requirements

HHAC also worked to refine House Bill 26-1235, which initially would have required home- and community-based services providers to submit annual medical loss ratio reports and would have directed the state to publicly post provider-specific information online.

HHAC raised concerns that the proposal would create unnecessary administrative work, fail to account for differences among provider business models and potentially create future pressure for arbitrary reimbursement policies.

As a result of advocacy by HHAC and through discussions with stakeholders, the bill was amended. The final legislation replaces the ongoing reporting requirement with a one-time state data collection and legislative report.

Supporting patient access to care

HHAC supported House Bill 26-1262, which helps preserve access to compounded medications and medical products that are often important in hospice and long-term care settings.

The association also monitored more than 50 bills affecting health care providers, workforce issues, Medicaid policy and regulatory requirements to ensure members' perspectives were represented throughout the legislative process.

What we're watching next

Although the legislative session has ended, the work continues.

Medicaid Commission

State lawmakers have created a new commission focused on Medicaid spending, utilization and administration. With Medicaid costs continuing to outpace state revenue growth, HHAC expects home care, home health and hospice services to remain a significant topic of discussion.

HHAC will actively participate in these conversations and continue educating policymakers about the value of home-based care and the importance of maintaining adequate reimbursement rates.

Additional budget pressures

State budget experts expect Colorado's fiscal challenges to continue. Many lawmakers have acknowledged that this year's budget relied on one-time solutions, raising concerns that additional cuts could be considered during the next budget cycle.

HHAC will continue advocating for policies that protect access to care and recognize the critical role providers play in helping Coloradans remain safely at home.

HHAC will continue working with state agencies to seek practical solutions and ensure members' concerns are heard.

Get involved

The challenges facing home care, home health and hospice providers are growing more complex each year. Effective advocacy includes providers willing to share their experiences and explain how policy decisions affect patients, caregivers and local communities.

HHAC members interested in becoming more involved are encouraged to join the HHAC Legislative Ambassador Program. The program provides opportunities to engage directly with lawmakers, respond to emerging policy issues and help shape the future of care in Colorado.

Together, we can ensure policymakers understand the essential role home-based care plays in Colorado's health care system.

 

House Energy & Commerce Republicans Press for 80-20 Repeal

Alliance Daily

On Friday, January 31, nine Republicans on the U.S. House of Representatives’ Energy and Commerce Committee sent a letter to President Donald J. Trump, asking his administration to repeal the Medicaid 80-20 provision. The letter encourages the new administration to prioritize overturning the 80-20 provision of the Access Rule and to instead work collaboratively with the home care community to address the core issues that contribute to low homecare access in Medicaid.

In the letter, Reps. Buddy Carter (GA), Kat Cammack (FL), John Joyce (PA), Gus Bilirakis (FL), Troy Balderson (OH), August Pfluger (TX), Dan Crenshaw (TX), Nicholas Langworthy (NY), Erin Houchin (IN) wrote:

“The untested, one-size fits all approach of the 80/20 rule will reduce, not expand, Medicaid access. The 80/20 rule was introduced without a basis in data, actual experience, or an understanding of costs associated with the provision of home-based care, nor was it the result of legislation […] Instead of mandating an unsustainable payment pass through, we request that the Administration work quickly to rescind this component of the Access Rule and instead turn the focus towards working with stakeholders to address the fundamental issues driving workforce shortages and the resulting lack of access for consumers.”

The Alliance appreciates the support and advocacy of these Representatives and looks forward to working with them and the Administration to develop policies that appropriately address the workforce needs shortage in our field.

The letter is available HERE.

 

Gabbard, RFK Jr. Pass Committee Hurdles in Win for Trump

The Hill / BY Al Weaver and Nathaniel Weixel

Tulsi Gabbard and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Tuesday cleared crucial hurdles toward winning Senate confirmation, handing President Trump a key win as he looks for an early display of loyalty from GOP lawmakers.

Gabbard and Kennedy overcame high-stakes committee votes that went down to the wire in their bids to lead the U.S. Intelligence apparatus and the Department of Health and Human Services, respectively.

Skeptical Republicans on each committee made the decision to back them in the final days before the votes after Trump officials, including Vice President Vance, and other GOP leaders cajoled them into maintaining an unblemished slate of nominees who have gone through the committee process. 

How the process played out underscores how wary Republicans are of incurring Trump’s wrath only weeks into his administration.

“They’re not going to go against him. If they go against him, they go against 77 million people,” Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) said, referring to Trump’s popular vote total in November. “I don’t think they want that if they want [to get] reelected.”

Both nominees now appear likely to be confirmed on the Senate floor in the coming week, though the final votes could be close. Democrats remain vehemently opposed to both nominees, and there are a handful of Republicans who haven’t said how they intend to vote…

Read Full Article

 

Musk’s DOGE Team Mines for Fraud at Medicare, Medicaid

Modern Healthcare / By Riley Griffin and Madison Muller

Elon Musk’s team at the Department of Government Efficiency has been on-site at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to mine key systems for examples of what they consider fraud or waste, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The DOGE representatives have gained access to payment and contracting systems, according to the person, who asked not to be named discussing internal matters. They have also been working to cancel diversity, equity and inclusion-focused contracts at CMS and more broadly across the Department of Health and Human Services, the person said, including with organizations like Deloitte. 

Elon Musk’s team of government efficiency enforcers have been tearing through U.S. agencies, including the Treasury Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development. The group, run by the world’s richest person and President Donald Trump’s largest donor, says it’s trying to cut costs and staffing levels across the U.S. government.

But the group’s actions are stirring up controversy among staffers, some of whom have tried to block DOGE representatives from accessing information, as well as lawsuits from unions that accuse agencies of illegally letting their members’ information be shared with DOGE. On Tuesday, USAID said most of its 10,000 employees will be placed on administrative leave starting Friday…

Read Full Article

 

ICE is Actively Conducting Raids and Investigations

SESCO Management Consultants

SESCO clients from multiple states and cities have contacted us concerning being investigated by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials.

This significantly increased activity is subsequent to Trump’s pledge to remove undocumented migrants from the country.

ICE Authority to Enforce Immigration Laws

  • ICE has the authority to arrest and detain undocumented migrants. It can conduct workplace raids and other enforcement activities to effectuate these arrests.
  • ICE must present a judicial warrant to enter nonpublic areas of a workplace. A judicial warrant is signed by a federal judge, not an immigration officer. The warrant must provide specific details, such as the name of the individual to be arrested, the location, and the reason for the arrest. Without a judicial warrant, ICE is only allowed to be in public areas of the workplace.
  •  ICE has the authority to execute the warrant and that may include detaining persons not specifically named in the warrants.

What To Do If an ICE Agent Visits

  • All employees should remain calm and composed.
  • Only the designated points of contact should interact with ICE agents. These individuals should be well-versed in the organization’s policies and the legal rights of employees.
  • Designated points of contact should have ICE agents identify themselves by name and badge number. Employers must lawfully abide with providing information and access to facilities where a valid warrant is presented.
  • Designated points of contact should politely request to see and review any warrants presented by ICE agents and ensure the warrants are valid and specific to the premises before permitting access to any private areas. For the warrant to be valid, it must be signed by a federal judge (a judge’s signature will indicate such). If the warrant is a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Form I-200 or I-205 signed by an immigration officer, this is not a judicial warrant. In this case, the employer can advise the ICE agent that the warrant is not a valid judicial warrant and that the ICE agents may not enter any private areas – they must remain only in public areas.
  • Points of contact should provide information or documents required by a valid warrant but need not provide information or records falling outside of the warrant.
  • After the ICE visit, document the event by immediately identifying the names and badge numbers of ICE agents who were present, the time and duration of their presence, and any actions taken by the agents.

SESCO is suggesting that all clients review and prepare I-9 documentation for such an investigation. If you have any concerns about your I-9 compliance, please contact SESCO immediately.

Finally, SESCO can conduct an I-9 audit to determine compliance.

 
<< first < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > last >>

Page 1 of 388